eCommerce, Shopability & webOS
Microsoft Tag: The QR Code on Steroids
Last time, I talked about using QR Codes to help push mobile business. These “scancodes” can direct users to web sites, provide contact information and even connect to wireless devices. But, they’re limited.

The Microsoft Tag for this web site. You can get the reader at http://gettag.mobi
Enter: Microsoft Tag – a colorful, visually appealing code that offers more than just the basics. With Microsoft Tag you can create custom tags that allow you to integrate your brand within the tag itself. Tags are scanned (shot with a camera on a mobile device) much like QR Codes, but there’s a few things Microsoft did that makes life a whole lot easier.
Microsoft’s High Capacity Color Barcodes (HCCBs) were designed to work with the limitations of smartphone cameras. So, even with a somewhat blurry picture users can get a more accurate read. The tags also don’t need to be as large, and can be scaled down to as little as 3/4” in print. That saves some prime real estate.
Other enticing features include the ability to expire tags and track usage statistics. Tags can also utilize GPS, which means manufacturers and store chains can direct consumers to the nearest location. And, tags can be converted for black and white (no color) display or printing.

You can actually brand the tags. Screenshot from Microsoft Tag's Implementation Guide.
Custom tags, however, are what really make Microsoft Tag so attractive. If you’re handy with Adobe Illustrator, for example, you can save a raw image of the tag and modify it to truly brand it for your business.
One caveat, though, is the availability of reader apps. While nearly every working smartphone today has some way of reading QR Codes, a Microsoft Tag reader is not available across all platforms. This, however, is due to change in the near future as the company recognizes the need to release apps for all platforms.
So, how does Microsoft Tag stand up to QR Codes? After all, major companies have used both types of codes for interactive content.
QR Code
- Simple to generate code, but limited in its display (no customization of design).
- Accessible readers – apps are available for nearly any smartphone.
- Content and information fed is limited.
- No true analytics through free usage.
Microsoft Tag
- Simple to generate, not-so-simple to customize (you need to know graphic design and key elements).
- Content and information can be updated.
- Stats reporting and expired linking.
- Apps not yet available for all devices.
Some say it’s all a matter of choice. Others say Microsoft Tag will outright replace the QR Code (which hasn’t yet been put into full effect due to its “geekiness”). With all of this being so new to the average user, you can choose either system, but with the understanding that, while more limited, a higher number of consumers can scan QR Codes.
How about you? Were you aware of QR Codes and Microsoft Tag before reading these posts? Do you use them? And how does their anticipated popularity change the way you think of the future of your business? Let us know…
| Print article |











about 1 month ago
Maybe this will help?
Microsoft Tags are indirect i.e. your mobile device has to connect to the internet to decode them. QR Codes have the data embedded in the code itself. So for example you can scan QR Coded contact details (business cards) and store them in your mobile device without a WiFi connection or using your data plan.
Microsoft tags are proprietary in that only Microsoft know how they are encoded and decoded and the only place in the world you can generate them is the Microsoft website. QR Codes are open source and a published ISO standard. Therefore there are hundreds of free generators and plenty of free scanning software for mobile devices.
Microsoft tags does indeed provide some limited tracking stats however if you want to map the behavior or conversion of barcode visitors versus others on your site you will need Google Analytics (or similar). With QR Codes you simply obtain all the stats you need by putting Google Analytics on your mobile site which is free.
These are three of the reasons why we are seeing an explosion in the use of QR Codes but only the occasional use of proprietary codes such as Microsoft tag.
about 1 month ago
Roger:
Seeing that Microsoft itself is much better known, do you see this as being a reason many larger companies are using these colorful tags?
about 1 month ago
I was aware of MS Tags almost 2 years ago, early Beta for them. I was fascinated, but, let’s face it, no one used them.
Then, there’s been the influx of QR Tags over the past 6 months who’ve laid claim to being the new “standard.”
Enter the likes of JagTag (and, the earlier version of that format from Spyderlynk) which are visual keywords, and don’t need a Reader.
While Microsoft Tags work extremely well, I’d written them off as dead-in-the-water until this summer where we see them in a wide range of print publications (Seems like Microsoft are paying for these media buys?) and they are now being perceived as a competitive “standard”?
If MS Tags could include a non-Reader function where the image was processed server-side (sent to a shortcode), they just might usurp QR in the States? It could come down to a battle between MS and Google, if Google want QR to be the standard? Ownership of “mobile space engagement” is battle that hasn’t begun in earnest yet…it’s early days…
about 1 month ago
Very interesting comments, Bob. Actually has got me thinking…
about 1 month ago
Thanks for the clarification!
about 1 month ago
Great Article!
You say that QR codes are free usage-
Why not Microsoft Tags?
about 1 month ago
Sorry for the confusion. I was referring to scan reports. By default, QR Code generation does not include tracking stats, but there are some pay-for services that say they can provide this type of data.
Microsoft Tag, however, includes these core stats in the base product (no charge).